Friday, 13 February 2015

And this is why we do

It's been a busy week. A very busy week. Which is why it's taken me until Friday to sit down and write about some awesome news we received on Monday.

You might remember that last year I went to Westminster along with Stacie Lewis of Mama Lewis fame, Hannah Postgate from Rosy & Bo and Mr Boo's mum from Premmeditations to assist with the all-party Parliamentary Inquiry into childcare for disabled children. We gave evidence to testify for our experiences of trying, and failing, to find appropriate and adequate childcare for our children, who all have different disabilities and care needs.

We made suggestions for what some of the solutions might be to help enable parent carers (and particularly mothers) to be able to work. For many of us being able to work isn't simply a 'lifestyle choice' (as some of us have been told by the local authorities who are supposed to support us), but it is a financial imperative.

As it is for most families.

Our needs and desires to work are no different because we happen to have a child with disabilities. And yet finding childcare is, all too often, impossible because providers are often not set up to cater for individual needs or, if they can and are willing (i.e. gold dust!), the cost is prohibitive to all but the extremely wealthy.

It was a privilege to be able to take part in democracy in action and to converse openly with the MPs and peers involved in the Inquiry. My eyes were opened to a hugely productive part of our political system that we just don't see via the media lens which is so often focused on the negative.

The Inquiry led to the launch of a report of recommendations for resolving the issue of childcare for disabled children. But, well, what next?

How does this report translate into real change?

Through continued campaigning and pressure on decision makers.

Recently the 'Counting the Costs' campaign by Contact a Family was particularly hard hitting in its openness and recognition of the enormous additional costs associated with having a child with disabilities - and therefore the additional imperative on families with disabled children to be able to provide an income for themselves.

And the hard work is starting to pay off.

It's incredibly early days, and with a General Election just around the corner there is still a huge amount of work to do, but on Monday came a fantastic piece of news.

The Government has decided to introduce legislation to double the maximum amounts that parents of disabled children can pay in to their Tax-Free Childcare Schemes, in recognition of the higher childcare costs that parents of disabled children face, all too often making childcare massively more expensive than the salary it would enable a parent to earn.

Here's the lowdown from the Government consultation response:

“Representations were made during consultation that additional support should be provided for disabled children in view of the generally higher childcare costs their parents can face. Similar comments were also made during the Bill’s Commons Committee stage when the Exchequer Secretary to the Treasury made a commitment to consider this matter further.

Having considered this, the Government has decided to introduce legislation to increase the maximum amount that parents of disabled children can pay into their childcare accounts, in recognition of the higher childcare costs these families incur. For accounts for disabled children, the maximum payment for a standard three month entitlement period will be doubled to £4,000. This means that a parent with a disabled child will be able to pay up to £16,000 into their childcare account per year and receive top-up payments of up to £4,000. This will be achieved by amending section 19 of the Act through a separate statutory instrument.”

And for the geeks among us the full Government consultation can be found here.

This is a very important first step on the path to levelling the childcare playing field. And it opens a window for further change to address the still significant challenges, some of which I will recap:

  • Only a quarter of local authorities say they have enough childcare to meet the needs of the disabled children within their locality. 
  • Almost half of parent carers cannot access the 15 hours preschool education to which all children are entitled.
  • Childcare provision is often completely lacking in its ability to be inclusive for disabled children, either through lack of understanding of what can and should be done to allow disabled children to join childcare settings, or through lack of adequate specialist support from the local authority to provide training, resources and adaptations.

There remains an expectation among local authorities that parent carers of disabled children don't (or perhaps shouldn't) work. It is this that is all too often so damaging and it is this that urgently needs challenging if we are to make headway in enabling parent carers to fulfil their legal right to work.

We are lucky in that we live in an area where the local authority is willing to do things differently, and prides itself on providing good quality support to people with disabilities and their families, and yet even here, for our own part, we are still reliant on family to provide after-school help that enables me to keep working. Without this, we'd be in seriously dire straights.

There is still an enormous amount to do, but we pause for a moment to celebrate this small but significant win.

Thursday, 5 February 2015

About a dude

I’ve had a bit of a break from writing this blog over recent months. I felt myself losing momentum over the course of last year and also not wanting to write. In retrospect I know this is because through the act of writing, I am forced to come face to face with just exactly how I feel about my given topic and there were events unfolding last year that were so stressful, and so loaded with importance for Orange’s future, that I dared not commit words to a page.

Perhaps worse, I knew we were treading a very fine line of persuasion with the local authorities involved in decision making for Orange, and I didn’t want to upset the political apple cart during that process. I knew that whatever I wrote during this period, I would have to self-censor, which defeated the point of keeping this blog entirely.

Now Orange is in school, some of those shackles have fallen away but thankfully so have many of the difficulties and challenges we were facing. We are moving into what I hope will be a happier and more settled time for us all, with Orange getting just exactly what he needs from his wonderful new school. 

When I think of his future there, I see a fulfilled and exciting one, with great challenges and opportunities, and I trust them implicitly to do the right thing by our son.

And so this leads me to thinking about the blog again, and what to use it for. It’s taken me a while to figure out but now I have gathered some clarity on how this blog will progress. I’ve always wanted it to be a positive view of family life with a severely disabled child and I hope I can return it to being that now.

When I first knew that Orange was facing a difficult and uncertain future, and I was desperately scared of what was to come, it was other parents’ blogs that made me see through the quagmire of frankly terrifying medical terms, academic studies and reports to a brighter future. A future that included a sweet little boy, who is easy going, cute as can be, who is positively addicted to Peppa Pig and likes to shout at the telly when the rugby is on. A boy who can demolish a man size bowl of porridge, hates having his nose wiped, laughs when his sister is getting a telling off, listens sweetly to stories and who goes nuts in the swimming pool. 

If he could, he’d be that boy bombing into the pool and splashing everyone while laughing his head off.

The truth is that his disabilities do not take away from the fact that Orange really is just a boy. A little boy who is part of a family like any other. This is something I just completely didn’t understand when I was holding my tiny boy in my arms and scaring myself witless reading academic papers on rare genetic syndromes. None of them, not even the fact sheets designed for parents’ consumption, actually communicated that through it all, whatever we were facing, he would still be just a little boy, a small person with likes and dislikes, a sense of humour and the capacity for love and affection in a way that I couldn’t possibly comprehend. 

He is, to his very core, just a dude.

And so, in addition to the very necessary campaigning work that needs to be done on childcare and inclusion, that’s what I will use this blog for. To get right back on track and tell that story. To give hope to other parents, sitting, holding their tiny child and wading through the quagmire. Because there is every reason for that hope. And sometimes it just needs someone else’s story to help bring it alive.

Wednesday, 26 November 2014

Teapots And Chocolate

I'm quite a fan of tea. And a huge fan of chocolate. But we all know what happens when you try to make a teapot out of chocolate, right?

This was pretty much the scenario at our 'Team Around the Child' (TAC) meeting today. The official line is that these meetings are to bring together all of Orange's professionals at regular intervals to ensure he (and we as his family) are getting all the help and support that's needed. Sounds great...

But after two meetings in a row, where I have been given the Spanish Inquisition over how we care for Orange, surrounded by a room full of professional faces who are no help at all in assisting us with Orange's most pressing needs, I'm beginning to wonder just what they are for, beyond a tracking and auditing service for the local authority?

The two most urgent needs we as a family have had in the last year have been a) getting Orange his place at the right special school and b) finding adequate, specialist childcare. And yet not one of the professionals involved in our TAC meeting process has contributed anything positive at all to help us get there.

In fact, none of the local authority people in the room today - including the regional senior SENCO (Special Educational Needs Co-ordinator), our 'Lead Professional' and the 'Link Person' between Cornwall Council and the special school Orange will be attending in our neighbouring local authority, knew anything about the fact he'd been offered a place at the special school we've been pushing for.

Nothing. I had to tell them. And, get this. They didn't believe me. If I'd heard 'IF Orange starts at that school' any more times I think I'd have had to ask them all to leave mid-sentence. I don't know how many more times I'd have had to say 'his transition meeting is on Friday' to get one particular person to drop the 'ifs'.

I like to keep this blog positive. To put out into the world a view of life with a disabled child that is full of happiness, purpose and fulfilment, and to show the world that we are just a common-or-garden family, trying to get on in life and do what everybody else does too.

But right now I'm feeling trapped and angry. Surrounded and cornered by local authority busy bodies who sit in my living room and tell me nothing more than what I can't do, and provide no positive solutions, help or guidance other than to repeat constantly that they are here 'to support us'.

Well perhaps the local authority would like to consult with the Chambers Thesaurus that tells me in black and white that 'to support' is 'to advocate for', 'to encourage, endorse and assist'.

I had, naively, assumed that our Team Around the Child, and the Lead Professional of that team, would be our first line for any help we might need. Our first port of call for informed assistance, signposting to services that we might not know about, and actually providing practical help to work towards addressing our needs.

Instead, at each meeting I have to answer a steady stream of jargon-filled questions so the local authority can tick boxes on a document. A document that contains deeply personal information about our family circumstances that I can't even see before it is circulated to all and sundry because the local authority will not email anything to anyone outside of their own four walls.

And after the Spanish Inquisition I am told all sorts of marvellous gems like 'you choose to make your life more difficult by working' and blatantly unhelpful untruths such as 'well, the school is full, you know' (repeat x 100, and we're IN now so neeeeeerrr...).

After being surrounded by a sea of blank, pointless faces for the second time in as many months, when asking basic things like 'how can you help us find trained people to provide childcare and babysitting for Orange, when you are telling us we cannot leave him with a regular babysitter and I'm going INSANE here trapped in my own house...', and being told nothing more than we should 'ring the Family Information Service' (which we've done, and they were similarly chocolatey in nature), I think it is time to Sack The TAC.

Individually, I'm sure they are all perfectly pleasant people. Likeable and kind, I'm sure. But I was probably stupid to trust them. Naive to believe that they can actually provide any help.

And what has crystallised it for me is this.

After today's TAC meeting I was absolutely beyond the end of my wit. In desperation, I poured my heart out to Facebook and asked if anyone could help us find some specialist childcare.

Within an hour, I had messages and phone calls coming out of my ears from people (some of them professionals with access to the same information as those in our TAC), giving us details of local charities that provide specialist childcare, organisations that provide nursing care in the home that we can use some of our Direct Payments to fund, websites we can use to search for babysitters with special needs experience, and local support groups that might be a good source of contacts.

I'd like to know why my sofa full of professionals couldn't, or chose not to, share any of this information with us when asked. I'm pretty sure I know. It's either incompetence, or money, or both.

I've had an extremely large gin and tonic. And an entire box of Maltesers. For now, I'm off to bed to read about Buddhist Monks, and calm my seething heart.

But tomorrow? Tomorrow, it's firing squad time.


Saturday, 15 November 2014

Educating Orange

Yesterday we had some extremely good news. Even better news than the safe return of Bert (thank you Selfridges...).

Orange has a school place. Not just any old school place, but a place in the very best school in the region for children with physical disabilities. Naturally, we are over the moon. His future education is secure. Orange can learn in the very best environment for children with his particular type of needs. Supported by the most wonderful, skilled, caring staff. He will be safe, loved and helped to fulfil his potential by experts who understand him. I cannot fully explain the relief that this news brings.

But there is more to it than that. And hopefully this might go some way to explain why I have perhaps been a little strange, and distracted, for what feels like the longest time.

Getting Orange into school has been anything but simple. It's pretty much consumed me for the best part of eighteen months. I've wanted so much to write about it along the way as I've struggled to think about much else but there is a very good reason I haven't been able to. Politics.

The politics of trying to secure a special school place in another local authority, for a child under statutory school age, with no diagnosis, at a school that is already full could fill an entire book.

It should be simple. Child with complex needs. Nearest school that specialises in said needs. And you're in, right? In a word, no.

I can't think of another process that has involved quite as much smoke and mirrors. It is labyrinthine. Awash with riddles, rhymes, booby traps and games. Super Mario had nothing on this.

The daftest thing about it, in our case, is that there isn't a person involved with Orange who would say this school is wrong for him. And yet the system that Orange's professional team works within has become so bureaucratic that not one of them was able to say publicly 'yes, I agree that's the right school for Orange, let's talk about how we help you get him in.' Not one.

Even the school itself had its hands tied. Orange has been attending playgroups and swimming sessions at the school for eighteen months. The staff knows him well. His photographs are up on the notice board in the corridor. And yet, the system has meant even the school did not have the freedom to talk openly with us about securing a place for Orange.

For eighteen months we have had to blindly but doggedly follow a process, knowing with 100% certainty that this school is the right, and only, option for Orange, all the while being told repeatedly that we were trying to achieve the impossible. Worse, knowing that the final decision lay with office staff in two local authorities who have never met our child, and for whom funding and finance is the primary concern.

Many a time, I have sat in my living room surrounded by professional faces telling us nothing other than 'the school is full'. Individuals who I like and respect, and who are enormously helpful to us, but who are so trapped in a local authority system beset with politics that leaves them powerless.

Throughout this entire process we have often felt utterly alone. Unable to talk honestly and openly about what constitutes the right school for Orange because the very people who are experts and know what he needs (his educational psychologist, physio, occupational therapist, Portage worker, paediatrician, early years senior SENCO), are all employed by a local authority that forbids them from making open recommendations to parents.

We have had to trust in our own belief that this school is the right one for Orange, and push against bolted doors with unwavering faith, surrounded by nothing but negativity about what we were doing. Driven by our own instinct about our child, but unable to ask for advice from any of the experts that surround us, knowing that they couldn't give us any straight answers. Or any answers at all.

Eighteen months of bureaucracy. Months of statutory assessment for Orange, reports and draft statements, wondering what to do with a statement of special educational needs that specified no school, three months of preparing for a tribunal hearing that we could afford no legal representation for, seeking out advice where we could from charities on how to make our legal case, and still not knowing if any of this work would result in getting Orange his school place.

Nights that should have been spent sleeping, sat instead with hundreds of pages of the SEN Code of Practice, highlighting bits relevant to our case. Daytimes when I should have been working, with the phone on redial to IPSEA to seek out legal advice. Countless meetings and correspondence where we have been told in riddles that 'you can't do this', while persistently and single-mindedly carrying on.

For us, the story has a happy ending. Instead of spending Christmas preparing case files for the tribunal hearing, we will now be celebrating. There have been so many times when we could have given up, and indeed the system frequently encouraged us to do so. Our hard work and determination has paid off, although I am sure not without a huge dose of luck, too.

But our story is far from unique. Hundreds if not thousands of other parents and children around the country are also facing the same, and worse. I wish I was exaggerating when I say that, at its very worst, this process bankrupts families with legal fees into the tens of thousands. It breaks marriages. It leaves mothers, and fathers, at the deepest depths of depression and seriously mentally unwell. We are extremely lucky that we have come out the other side relatively intact and with the right result for our child.

The truth is, there simply aren't enough special school places. There isn't enough money. And there aren't enough people within the system who are willing or able to stand up and change that. They are silenced, and afraid, or just not that interested. Leaving parents to continue battling their way through a system that does very little to work in the favour of the child.

Any parent will tell you that getting a school place for their child can be a nervous time. But how wrong is it that we live and work within a system that makes this process all the more difficult for our most vulnerable? For those that are most in need. It is a system that compromises everyone within it.

For us, we're going to take a short while to breathe a huge sigh of relief. But once I have recovered myself I will continue to advocate in any way I can for families who are going through the system. And campaign for change.

Monday, 27 October 2014

Have you seen this Bert? #findbert

This is a post I never wanted to write. It's an appeal for help.

Remember Bert from Sesame Street? Yellow headed, monobrowed half of Sesame Street's favourite comedy duo?

For a long time now, Orange has lived life alongside Bert. Bert is Orange's best friend. His comfort toy. His sleep companion. In the absence of language, Orange has used Bert as a means of understanding life and communicating with the people around him.

Bert settles him to sleep, comforts him when he wakes in the night, watches him eat, acts as a trusty companion at nursery and hospital appointments, and is his constant in what can be, for Orange, a very confusing world.

On Sunday afternoon, Bert went missing in Selfridges, Oxford Street. A parent's nightmare, losing a toddler's favourite toy in a busy department store. Gone in a flash. In the seconds between checking his little yellow head was still there, alongside Orange in the buggy, he was gone. Dropped, picked up by another little pair of hands, kicked aside by passing people traffic, taken out of his hands, we don't know...

I will refrain from actually naming the parent on whose watch Bert disappeared, but you can take it from this that it wasn't me. The fact it was in the technology suite on the lower ground floor should clear up any final doubts... ;)

An hour of searching and hounding the store's staff (and some wifely hissing and shouting, just in case you still weren't sure which parent was to blame...), with still no sign, we cut our losses and left. Without Bert.

Later that day, we embarked on a solemn trip home to Cornwall leaving Bert somewhere, on the loose, in London.

A transatlantic hunt for a replacement began. We will, perhaps, end up with an army of Berts as a result. But none of them will be the original, best-loved, slightly chewed and most definitely dog-eared Bert.

In an attempt to squash my own melodrama about the whole incident, I'm trying to un-learn what I know about the scientific evidence for children preferring their own cherished comfort items over identical replacements.

It's kind of ridiculous I know... I mean it's not a missing person, or a family pet, but we have no way of explaining to Orange what has happened. He is upstairs in his bed shouting for him right now, unable to sleep.

I'm hoping on a wing and a prayer that social media can help us reunite Orange with his best pal Bert. Were you in Selfridges on Oxford Street on Sunday afternoon? Did you see this Bert? #findbert

Monday, 1 September 2014

The power of parental instinct

We all doubt ourselves as parents sometimes, don't we?

When a multitude of questions remain over your child's health and a veritable army of institutionally appointed 'experts' are involved in their care it's even easier to let one's self-confidence falter. We know our own children best and yet the weight of expert voices that surrounds us when a child has complex additional needs can begin to drown out that all important human element that is parental instinct.

Of course, it goes without saying that we are hugely grateful for all the support, guidance and advice we receive for Orange. We have (I think) a truly excellent team around us. But there are times when it feels like our own voices, opinions and instinct are drowned out by the authorities that now encircle our lives.

Teams of physiotherapists, occupational therapists, speech and language therapists, audiologists, visual support teachers and educational psychologists tell us what our child is capable of and what will aid his development and we are expected to follow their lead, mostly without question. Teams of neurologists, geneticists, cardiologists and paediatricians give us educated guesses on what might be causing our child's difficulties and the aspects of his health we should be concerned about and not concerned about.

Teams of social workers and early support workers evaluate how we are coping with everything having an undiagnosed child throws at us. Teams of occupational therapists, grant officers and surveyors even examine how we manage with daily life with an immobile child in our own home and make open judgements on which door we should use to get in and out, how we should bath our child and move him around from room to room.

We trust and respect our team. We listen to them and value their input. But there are times when it feels invasive. There are times I want to question. Times when I want to wrap up my small boy and take him away from all the institutionally imparted advice, the paperwork, reports and evaluations of our lives. There are times when my instinct as a parent tells me the right thing, actually, at that moment, is to close the doors to the world and cut our own path for a while.

Because how do we know that what we are told is right? How do we really know? There is a huge leap of faith that has to go into following the professional advice we are given. Often it is given on the basis of seeing our child for less than half an hour, sometimes on shaky scientific evidence and little true knowledge in the face of a child whose diagnosis remains elusive. How do we know that this one professional sitting in front of us is right?

There have been times when I have known that what we are being told or advised is incorrect and not in the best interests of our child...

The cocksure paediatrician who confidently declared she had 'never failed to find a vein' for taking blood who then failed, sending Orange into massive sensory overload that triggered a seizure, caused him to stop breathing and precipitated crash teams running from all corners to resuscitate him as he lay on my chest, blue and still. I wish to this day I hadn't let her try.

The nurse who missed his post-op medication and barked at me that 'it wasn't on her schedule and we'd have to wait for the next round' when I requested his overdue painkillers, mere hours after he had been through invasive surgery. It took shouting and tears (me and Orange) to get his meds given before he was overwhelmed with pain.

And less catastrophic... the wheelchair services occupational therapist who thought it would be fine to order a wheelchair for Orange in which he could launch out sideways and head bang against a metal handle to his heart's content. Or perhaps the trillionth time it's been suggested that 'messy play' is the answer to all our feeding woes and the incredulous looks I have received repeatedly when I explain again that yes, my boy is very happy indeed to rub sweet potato and mackerel all over his own head, with glee. Delighted he is. But put it in his mouth, oh no, not so much...

Over the years I am learning to evaluate. To listen, to learn, and also to question. More than that I am learning once again to tune in to the parental instincts that I have at times cast into doubt in the face of more conventionally knowledgable voices. It's easy to forget that we know our own child best.

Human beings are not infallible. Sometimes, professionals are wrong and in my experience it is often my instinct that will tell me as much. It is often my instinct that tells me what is right for Orange, what will support his learning and development best and what will ensure he has a happy, fulfilling life with as much 'normality' in it as we can muster.

During our summer holiday, I read a very interesting book lent to us by a friend of my mum's. A book by a lady called Dorothy Butler, about her grand-daughter Cushla who, like Orange, had complex disabilities of unknown cause. Medical professionals and therapists provided little by way of useful practical advice for the family and faced with a child who cried and cried in distress day and night the parents followed their instinct and did what they knew best. They read to her. Read and read and read to her. And it unlocked something in that little girl that led to her developing more skills than anyone could ever have predicted.

The story of 'Cushla and her Books' is both an academic study of the power of language and a hugely inspiring tale of a young family that treated their complex child with love and instinct, with the most unbelievable results. Their child, once disconnected from the world by her disabilities, lost, lonely and unreachable, blossomed.

My instinct has told me that Orange needs to be surrounded by music and nature. Music speaks to him in a way that words alone often do not. When he was smaller, the only way we could get him to eat was to sing to him. As a three year old, he comes alive at the sound of his favourite tunes, dancing and singing and engaging with people around him. In nature, Orange is calm, happy, thoughtful and playful. He explores his world openly. It was on the beach in St Ives that he first showed us his little personality and that he was capable of play, and learning.

Nature and music are vital for Orange. And yet interestingly not once has any of his NHS/local authority appointed professional team (as good as they are) suggested that either is of significant benefit. Reading Cushla's story has reminded me that we ignore our parental instinct at our peril and that listening to it can only be a good thing.

As the new academic year begins (still feels like a good time for a fresh start, even aged 35), I've promised myself that I will listen to my own instinct with just as much intensity as I listen to our professional team. I will find the courage to question, to push for what I feel is right, to say no to medical procedures I know are not in Orange's interest (and hope I am not arrested for doing so...) and to follow my heart in knowing how to captivate and engage my little boy in his world.

Monday, 23 June 2014

The 'WeWork' mothers hit Westminster

Three years and three months ago, as I sat listening to the calming tones of hypnobirthing muzac in the garden suite at St Thomas's Hospital, overlooking The Houses of Parliament, I never imagined that the baby I was about to give birth to would end up taking me to within the Palace walls.

Had I listened to the universe that day there were hints along the way that the little person making his way into the world would be important not just to us but on a greater scale. A (frankly odd and unexpected) hint of politics was thrown in to my stultifying hours in the labour ward and my soothing muzac was interrupted, momentarily, by the arrival of the Under Secretary of State for Health having a tour of the 'superior facilities'... After she had asked if I was still alive as I sprawled myself in the only position that was comfortable across a faux fur birthing ball and into a bed full of plastic palm trees, I politely declined the suggested photo opportunity ;)

And of course 8 March 2011 marked the 100th anniversary of International Women's Day, also known in some circles as International Working Women's Day, which at the time I had no idea would prove to be so pertinent. As friends marched below across Westminster Bridge and beyond, on that crisp, sunny Spring day, representing women's continued pursuit of equality, I knew nothing of what was to come, and how this baby of mine would alter my world view and throw me into an interest in politics I never knew I had.

As you will know, I have been involved for a few months now in raising awareness of the issues faced by working parents, particularly mothers, of children who have disabilities. Last month, a Parliamentary Inquiry into childcare for disabled children, which facilitates parents to work, was launched, and it was with huge pride that I stepped forward as one of a small selection of working mothers of disabled children to speak at the Parliamentary Inquiry hearing, giving evidence to the group of MPs who are taking the Inquiry forward.

I, along with my compatriots at PremmeditationsRosy & BoMama Lewis and ABA4All, had a unique opportunity to share our, often challenging, experiences of securing childcare for our complicated children, with a view to influencing future policy and clearing an easier path for those who may follow in our footsteps. It was an honour and a privilege to do so and proved to be an intense, emotional and deeply worthwhile experience.

As a small group of women speaking to represent many thousands of our kind, while our personalities, lifestyles, children and careers are all rich in their variety, our experiences shadowed one another with eerie repetition.

Universally, we have struggled to secure adequate childcare for our children. Judged by those who are publicly employed to provide support for families like us, we have been told variously that it is 'frivolous and selfish to return to work', that 'mothers of children like ours don't work', that the funding which has been perilously patched in to allow our children to access limited childcare with much-needed 1-2-1 support 'could be pulled at any time' and 'can never be guaranteed for any longer than eight weeks'.

As we explained to the MPs, currently, there is no statutory requirement on childcare providers to take disabled children. As a reflection of that, the majority of childcare providers simply aren't set up to cater for much beyond the most mainstream of needs. And those rare diamonds in the dust that do exist will tell you that securing funding for children who need specialist input and 1-2-1 support to enable them to be safe and included in a childcare setting is one hell of a crusade.

Until recently, we have relied 100 per cent upon my mum to provide childcare for Orange to enable us both to work. Being entirely upfront, this has been no small issue for our family. If we had stayed in London, we would have been unable to find any childcare with funded 1-2-1 support and a specialist nanny being well beyond our means meant it was impossible for me to return to work. Had we not acted quickly, sold our home and left the city it is almost certain we would have eventually lost our home. With work a closed door to me and now on one income, the finances simply didn't add up.

We were lucky in that we were able to make the absolute best of a very difficult situation, relocating all the way across the country with mum who could help support us and facilitate my return to work. I will admit this has been a glistening silver lining to our sombre cloud, since Cornwall in all its beauty has brought us a sublime quality of life and our compact and unusual extended family unit is a very happy one.

But many families who wear our brand of shoes have not been in favoured situations like ours. They have lost their homes. They have lost their careers. They have sacrificed their mental wellbeing and more, and face a future more dependent upon the State than they ever imagined. All too often, this is for the simple reason that they could not access adequate childcare for their disabled children. It simply wasn't there. It is for these families that we speak.

The testimonies we shared at the Inquiry hearing weighed heavy with tales of anguish, determination, fear and frustration. Spurred on by financial imperative and cerebral calling to continue with our careers, even the most searing tenacity to find stimulating, safe, sunny and suitable early years care for our children has not overcome the recurring issues we face of transparency over funding, poor communication from local authorities and equality of access to childcare.

I am not alone in having been able to secure just six hours a week term-time 1-2-1 support for my child. He cannot attend a childcare setting without this support. At age three, he is legally entitled to access 15 hours a week of early years education in a childcare setting however he is prevented from doing so because the Local Authority has only secured six hours of 1-2-1 support.

And should we need more than 15 hours a week? To enable us to do a job part or even full time? Without the considerable financial means to fund both daycare fees and the hourly rate of a trained 1-2-1 carer, which would render most jobs economically unviable, there is currently no solution to this puzzle.

There seems to be no clear, accessible, ring-fenced funding within Local Authority budgets to pay for 1-2-1 support. If there is, we, and many others, have certainly not been told about it. As a parent, it appears that Local Authorities are clawing randomly from pots of money here and there to cobble together some semblance of minimal funding but there is no transparency over what exactly our children are entitled to, or how to access it.

In addition, no-one seems to be want to answer the question over why our children are all too often denied access to the full 15 hours a week of preschool education that they are statutorily entitled to, because 1-2-1 funding to match that simply isn't there.

And beyond funding and Local Authority bureaucracy, there are societal and attitudinal issues at play. Our testimonies at the Inquiry exposed stories of endless attempts to find childcare places for our children, to be told 'we can't cater for children like yours', 'we'd love to have him but our insurance won't cover us', 'our staff won't cope' or 'we'll put you on the waiting list' (the never-ending waiting list of one...guess who?).

Frankly, it seems from the testimonies delivered to the Inquiry last week that the world is often afraid of our children and so it pushes them away. Finds reason to exclude rather than include. In our part of the world, we have not found this to be such an issue but in the society we left behind in London and the South East, exclusion is a way of life. One parent enquired with dozens upon dozens of nurseries to find a place for her daughter only to be told 'no, we cannot cater for your child's needs'. No parent, in the face of a looming financial necessity to return to work, should have to face that.

As parents, we have all had to adapt to cater for our children in ways we could never have anticipated. We were not experts in disability when our children were born. We had no experience of epilepsy care, tube feeding, daily physio for hypotonic bodies, Makaton or appropriate play for the visually impaired. We learnt on the job. We skilled up. Because we had to.

So it stands to reason, as we shared with the MPs, that there is no grounds for childcare providers to deny they can do the same. But they must be granted support in order to be able to do so. After all, they have businesses to run and many of them run an already very tight ship. Our children are, admittedly, expensive. So what's the answer?

Placing a statutory requirement upon childcare providers to accommodate disability will only work if the funding is made available to support them. Funding to make their premises accessible, funding to train their staff in accommodating additional needs and funding to provide 1-2-1 support for the children who need it. My view is that this funding needs to be ring-fenced at a national level, or we shall face an increasingly unbalanced postcode lottery in service delivery.

But why? Why, when the austerity belt is still squeezing us tight should we be throwing money at something so seemingly niche? Surely we should just accept our lot and suck it up, right?

For a moment, I will put aside my passion about my right to work, and I will give you this. If I work, I am economically active. I am contributing to society. I am paying tax and delivering valuable communications support to businesses to help them grow. I am a professional and an expert in my field. In the business world, I have value to add.

Beyond that, I am a homeowner. An independent purchaser of things, payer of VAT and customer of businesses. I have no need for social housing or support from the welfare system. It pays for society to have people like me in work.

And for Orange? With just the limited six hours a week of preschool that he does get, he is coming on leaps and bounds. His 1-2-1 and nursery team work tirelessly and lovingly to include him in activities, enable him to communicate, teach him to feed himself and move his body. They have the time and the energy to facilitate his development in a way I can only ever limply shadow. The more input he gets now, the greater his chances are of being able to walk, talk and function in society as an adult. The more independence he can gain for his future, the lesser financial burden he will be upon the State.

It is simple economics.

But I shall also leave you with this. I echo Mama Lewis's words at the Inquiry hearing when I say that the other children at nursery adore Orange. They inquire sweetly as to his differences and then unquestioningly rest them aside and include him in their play. The staff can't get enough of his cuddles and his infectious laughter. They love caring for him. I know I am not being presumptuous when I say that children like ours bring light and joy to those that surround them. Adults and children alike learn that those who are seemingly less able than themselves contribute to the group in softer, less obvious ways and that the group is a richer, happier mix for their inclusion.

Mama Lewis asked the Inquiry 'Are these not the values we want to instil in the next generation?' The values that will be the building blocks of a society that genuinely cares for those who are vulnerable.

There is a slowly dawning realisation that inclusion is actually good for everybody. But this dawning is fragile and at risk of being swept aside by national and local policies that appears hell-bent on whipping the carpet away from under the feet of those in need.

And so I will continue my involvement with the Inquiry as it proceeds, playing my own small part in working towards a future that is one step ahead of our own.

Thank you to all the articulate and brilliant women who stood together in giving evidence to the Inquiry. We made a formidable team...

Here's a great little illustration of why we did what we did: #wework